<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentation at Refresh Denver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cylence.com/2008/09/22/presentation-at-refresh-denver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cylence.com/2008/09/22/presentation-at-refresh-denver/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=presentation-at-refresh-denver</link>
	<description>Elegance in Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 00:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Cross</title>
		<link>http://blog.cylence.com/2008/09/22/presentation-at-refresh-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cylenceweb.com/?p=76#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It actually was really informative. I learned a lot from Jay&#039;s presentation on Django. We discovered that the two frameworks are most different in their overall approach in retrieving data and displaying it.

Both frameworks aim consistently use best practices wherever possible, so their allotted power really rests in their base languages and ORM&#039;s. With that said, the languages themselves really only tend to vary in how they approach the logic and presentation side of things.

You might find the two presentations linked above of interest. We weren&#039;t exactly consistent in how we formatted our presentations, but they do both show a lot of the core of each frame work. Hope you find them interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually was really informative. I learned a lot from Jay's presentation on Django. We discovered that the two frameworks are most different in their overall approach in retrieving data and displaying it.</p>
<p>Both frameworks aim consistently use best practices wherever possible, so their allotted power really rests in their base languages and ORM's. With that said, the languages themselves really only tend to vary in how they approach the logic and presentation side of things.</p>
<p>You might find the two presentations linked above of interest. We weren't exactly consistent in how we formatted our presentations, but they do both show a lot of the core of each frame work. Hope you find them interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pomartel</title>
		<link>http://blog.cylence.com/2008/09/22/presentation-at-refresh-denver/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>pomartel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cylenceweb.com/?p=76#comment-2</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting experiment! What were the conclusions? The ups and downs of each frameworks? That would make a good follow-up post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's an interesting experiment! What were the conclusions? The ups and downs of each frameworks? That would make a good follow-up post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

